Hateful Racism Actually, Movie Director Takes Dump On Own Flick As War On Whites Allows No ‘Safe Space’ Or ‘Refuge’

The globalist left (MSM, democRATs and RINOs) are SO openly racist now that they are even hiring hispanics to be ‘White Nationalists’. We’ll discuss that next time, but when someone has an obviously hispanic last name and is still pushed as White, you know leftists are committed to their lie. And a nationalist is simply someone who loves their country above all others. Nobody has a problem with yellow nationalist Xi Jinping of communist China.

Which brings us to Richard Curtis, an obviously sub-human left-wing piece of trash, who has decided that his movie FROM ALMOST TWO DECADES AGO, ‘Love Actually’ (2003), isn’t ‘diverse’ {sic} enough.

That word USED to mean “showing a great deal of variety; very different”, but the DNA-denying alt-far-left have changed it to mean “including or involving people from a range of different social and ethnic backgrounds and of different genders, sexual orientations, etc.” DNA is still “settled science”.

First a little bit of Hollyweird math. The listed budget for that movie was $40-45 million, so we’ll call that $42.5 million. They rarely list the marketing, which is NEVER included in the budget…EVER. It varies but is usually about 50% the size of the budget, so we’ll go with $21.25 million, or $63.75 million out of pocket before any tickets are sold.

The official box office is listed as $246.8 million. The dirty little secret is that theaters get roughly half of that, so $123.4 million in this case. That means a $59.65 million profit, before home video and streaming, on a $63.75 million upfront investment.

If you could get back almost $2 for every $1 you invested, you would do so. This movie was a success! The theaters were happy. The actors and others who made it were happy. And the studio was happy. Everyone made money! So why is the director now complaining…19 years later?

He claims the movie now is “out of date” and “the lack of diversity makes me feel uncomfortable and a bit stupid”. This is a movie made right before the 2003 release. According to the 2001 UK census ‘population demographics’, there was a 58,789,194 ‘resident population’ which was 92.14% white at the time (85.67% White British + White (other) 5.27% + White Irish 1.2%).

Next on the list for the UK was Indian at 1.8% and then Pakistani at 1.3% (both considered Asian). Then less than 5% of the population was anything else. And since the cast was predominantly White, Curtis made a movie that looked like the country it was set in.

“There are things you’d change but, thank God, society is changing”, asshat McCuckface added. Curtis is a massive fan of the ‘great replacement’ (HERE, HERE and HERE), obviously. But other than lurching left, how much did things really change?

A study of UK population demographics for 2022 shows a population of 67,850,000, with the breakdown being 87.1% White, 7.0% Asian, 3.0% Black, 2.0% Mixed, 0.9% others. So, in 19 years up about 9 million people, but the white (AKA native) population dropped just over 5%.

The one black actor in the main cast, Chiwetel Ejiofor (‘Baron Mordo’ of the Marvel ‘Doctor Strange’ movies), played ‘Peter’, the guy who married (then) jail-bait actress Keira Knightley’s character ‘Juliet’ who still gets a visit by Peter’s friend and best-man ‘Mark’, played by future ‘The Walking Dead’ star Andrew Lincoln.

Mark tells her of his true feelings for her via a series of ready-made cue cards. Juliet and Peter had thought Mark hated her, but the reality was he acted cold towards her out of “self-preservation”.

Curtis added, “There is such extraordinary love that goes on every minute in so many ways [in life], all the way around the world, and makes me wish my film was better.” There was NOTHING wrong with your movie, ma’am. Remember YOU belong to a true minority and need to stop being a leftist stooge and represent! “Enough. Enough now.” –Mark walking away after Juliet kisses his cheek at end of the ‘signs’ scene.